My Photos

Statistics

4,704 total views

No articles found

run70 commented on a news article Nov 28th 2016, 5:15pm

The best 4 teams eligible for at-large were Claremont, Dana Hills, Mahomet-Seymour, and LaGrange-Lyons.

A closer look at the NXN at-large teams By Adam Kopet of DyeStat ...

Published by:

3 comment(s)

	DougB What good does it do to merge results from seven different courses? Do you think that's accurate? 0·Like·Reply·Nov 28th 2016, 9:10pm

	run70 The best 4 teams eligible for at-large were Claremont, Dana Hills, Mahomet-Seymour, and LaGrange-Lyons. 0·Like·Reply·Nov 28th 2016, 5:15pm

	Owen D. Bishop Makes absolutely no sense. Look at the Milesplit merged data from all NXN Regionals and California finals and numerous California teams have far higher rankings and results than many of the "At large" teams, and in reality better squads than many of the actual NXN qualifiers. 0·Like·Reply·Nov 27th 2016, 9:46pm

No articles found

You can link to any video on RunnerSpace and put it in your video box on your profile!